In Canada ministerial responsibility has been reduced as it has become increasingly common for top level civil servants to be called before Parliamentbypassing the minister.
Nor is his declaration broad in scope. The prerogative of Parliament to reject the nomination of ministers was not fully established in the United Kingdom until The most famous case was Bob Semplewho refused to resign in over engineering failures in the construction of a railway tunnel.
The Supreme Court ruled in that such discussions could not be disclosed because Article However, she later resigned. Finland[ edit ] In Finlandcollective responsibility has been established both constitutionally and as a convention.
Collective responsibility implies that ministers are bound by the decisions of the cabineteven when they had no part in their discussion or decision. The second chapter analyses the convention of collective ministerial responsibility, through which Cabinet is made collectively responsible to Parliament for the general conduct of the affairs of the country.
Inthe Beef Tribunal was investigating allegations of political corruption, and wanted to take evidence from a minister about cabinet meetings at which controversial proposals had been discussed.
Collective responsibility is not circumvented by appointing Ministers outside of Cabinet,  as has occurred in New Zealand where, from toWinston Peters and Peter Dunne were Ministers outside of Cabinet, despite their parties not being considered part of a coalition. With longstanding policy differences already on record, there is simply not the same public expectation of internal concord, and thus fewer consequences of dissonance being revealed.
Their personal beliefs concerning the interest rate — what they may think in private, argue for at the next internal review meeting, or discuss over their family dinner table — are no longer the relevant ones to reference when shaping their contribution to the collective project.
With the two presumably in alignment this is of course far easier to do. The prime minister selects a number of cabinet ministers from the House of Commons and the House of Lords. See Article History Ministerial responsibility, a fundamental constitutional principle in the British Westminster parliamentary system according to which ministers are responsible to the parliament for the conduct of their ministry and government as a whole.
Namely, majority coalition governments became the norm after President Kekkonen retired in The cabinet members, along with the Prime Minister, schedule weekly closed door sessions to discuss the collective stance of the cabinet to avoid inconsistent responses from cabinet ministers. Moreover, while those specific individuals would continue to be personally responsible for their past views and choices, neither new members nor the collective as a whole would be.
Canada[ edit ] For organizational purposes there are Cabinet Ministers who are responsible for all activity within their department. Similarly, while ministers must take responsibility for the errors of their subordinates, it does not follow that they must accept personal blame for these errors.
Are we witnessing a constitutional shift as significant as those debated in the EU referendum itself? If they consistently fail to Collective and individual ministerial responsibility this when acting in their representative capacity, then effectively those group attitudes will not exist.
Cabinet collective responsibility is therefore dependent on the mutual agreement and collective unity of the cabinet and its members. Ministerial responsibility is central to the parliamentary system, because it ensures the accountability of the government to the legislature and thus, ultimately, to the population.
Individually, ministers are also personally responsible to the parliament. Ministers commit to collective positions because it is an effective way to transcend continued differences. It is the existence and persistence of group-level commitments, belonging to the collective itself, that enables this.
The recognition of this principle in the United Kingdom did not, however, signify its extension to other countries of the British Empire. Genuine equivalents in the modern era are exceedingly rare, and always contentious. This collective attitude is no empty metaphor.
In some countries such as the United Kingdom and Canadathe legal standing of ministerial responsibility is also based on the oath taken by each minister upon becoming a member of the Privy Council. Below the institutional level, less formal tensions have similarly arisen.
It is distinct from party platforms and details the compromises that parties made in order to cooperate. Yet while tried and tested conventions are essential to the long-term resilience and effectiveness of government, they can — to a limited degree — be stretched, reshaped and put aside when the issues of the day demand it.
The most prominent Canadian cabinet minister to resign because he could not vote with the cabinet was John Turnerwho refused to support wage and price controls.Individual ministerial responsibility or Ministerial responsibility is a constitutional convention in governments using the Westminster System that a cabinet minister bears the ultimate responsibility for the actions of their department of ministry Minister would deny his/her individual and collective responsibility for executive actions.
The doctrines of collective and individual ministerial responsibility revisited. Sacco, Terence. URI: https: the constitutional conventions of collective and individual ministerial responsibility. This thesis seeks to discuss and analyse the subject matter of the conventions, their application and who applies them.
The second chapter. Individual Ministerial Responsibility is a constitutional convention that makes Government Ministers responsible for not only their own actions, but also for those of their department. It is not to be confused with collective cabinet responsibility, which states that cabinet members must approve.
Collective Responsibility. Joining the Cabinet brings with it individual responsibilities to perform and run their departments or portfolio to the satisfaction of the Prime Minister. Cabinet collective responsibility: how it works, and why it survives Cabinet collective responsibility: how it works, and why it survives During the referendum campaign – just as in – Cabinet ministers have been allowed to dissent from the government’s pro-Remain position.
There is a distinction between individual ministerial responsibility and the collective responsibility that each minister has to support the government of which he/she is a member.
Research Paper 04/Download